Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Beef flank steak, cooked
Beef flank steak, cooked3
VS
Pork spareribs, cooked Leader
Pork spareribs, cooked4

Pork spareribs, cooked leads 4–3 · 7 categories decided · 3 ties

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

Pork spareribs, cooked comes out ahead, winning 4 of 7 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Beef flank steak, cooked for less saturated fat, less sodium and more potassium.

Pick Pork spareribs, cooked for more protein, more calcium, more iron and more magnesium.

Evenly matched on fiber, sugar and vitamin C.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    202 kcal
    397 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    27.55 g
    29.06 gWIN
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    0 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total fat
    9.31 g
    30.3 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    WIN3.84 g
    11.12 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN53 mg
    93 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    WIN326 mg
    320 mg
  • Calciummore is better
    18 mg
    47 mgWIN
  • Ironmore is better
    1.8 mg
    1.85 mgWIN
  • Magnesiummore is better
    22 mg
    24 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    0 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Beef flank steak, cooked vs Pork spareribs, cooked · Foodatron