Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Beef flank steak, cooked
Beef flank steak, cooked3
VS
Veal cutlet, cooked Leader
Veal cutlet, cooked4

Veal cutlet, cooked leads 4–3 · 7 categories decided · 3 ties

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

Veal cutlet, cooked comes out ahead, winning 4 of 7 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Beef flank steak, cooked for less sodium, more calcium and more iron.

Pick Veal cutlet, cooked for more protein, less saturated fat, more potassium and more magnesium.

Evenly matched on fiber, sugar and vitamin C.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    202 kcal
    211 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    27.55 g
    36.16 gWIN
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    0 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total fat
    9.31 g
    6.33 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    3.84 g
    2.53 gWIN
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN53 mg
    67 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    326 mg
    383 mgWIN
  • Calciummore is better
    WIN18 mg
    8 mg
  • Ironmore is better
    WIN1.8 mg
    1.32 mg
  • Magnesiummore is better
    22 mg
    29 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    0 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Beef flank steak, cooked vs Veal cutlet, cooked · Foodatron