Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Beef flank steak, cooked
Beef flank steak, cooked3
VS
Wild boar, cooked Leader
Wild boar, cooked4

Wild boar, cooked leads 4–3 · 7 categories decided · 3 ties

Beef flank steak, cooked: 100 g · Wild boar, cooked: 100 g.

The verdict

Wild boar, cooked comes out ahead, winning 4 of 7 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Beef flank steak, cooked for less sodium, more calcium and more iron.

Pick Wild boar, cooked for more protein, less saturated fat, more potassium and more magnesium.

Evenly matched on fiber, sugar and vitamin C.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    202 kcal
    160 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    27.55 g
    28.3 gWIN
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    0 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total fat
    9.31 g
    4.38 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    3.84 g
    1.3 gWIN
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN53 mg
    60 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    326 mg
    396 mgWIN
  • Calciummore is better
    WIN18 mg
    16 mg
  • Ironmore is better
    WIN1.8 mg
    1.12 mg
  • Magnesiummore is better
    22 mg
    27 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    0 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.