Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Plate
Beef sirloin, cooked Leader
Beef sirloin, cooked4
VS
Canned tuna in water, drained
Canned tuna in water, drained3

Beef sirloin, cooked leads 4–3 · 7 categories decided · 3 ties

Beef sirloin, cooked: 100 g · Canned tuna in water, drained: 100 g.

The verdict

Beef sirloin, cooked comes out ahead, winning 4 of 7 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Beef sirloin, cooked for more protein, more potassium, more calcium and more iron.

Pick Canned tuna in water, drained for less saturated fat, less sodium and more magnesium.

Evenly matched on fiber, sugar and vitamin C.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    219 kcal
    116 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN29.02 g
    25.51 g
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    0 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total fat
    10.54 g
    0.82 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    4.09 g
    0.23 gWIN
  • Sodiumless is better
    58 mg
    50 mgWIN
  • Potassiummore is better
    WIN355 mg
    237 mg
  • Calciummore is better
    WIN19 mg
    11 mg
  • Ironmore is better
    WIN1.96 mg
    1.53 mg
  • Magnesiummore is better
    24 mg
    27 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    0 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.