Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Plate
Beef sirloin, cooked Leader
Beef sirloin, cooked4
VS
Chicken breast, cooked
Chicken breast, cooked3

Beef sirloin, cooked leads 4–3 · 7 categories decided · 3 ties

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

Beef sirloin, cooked comes out ahead, winning 4 of 7 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Beef sirloin, cooked for less sodium, more potassium, more calcium and more iron.

Pick Chicken breast, cooked for more protein, less saturated fat and more magnesium.

Evenly matched on fiber, sugar and vitamin C.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    219 kcal
    165 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    29.02 g
    31.02 gWIN
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    0 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total fat
    10.54 g
    3.57 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    4.09 g
    1.01 gWIN
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN58 mg
    74 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    WIN355 mg
    256 mg
  • Calciummore is better
    WIN19 mg
    15 mg
  • Ironmore is better
    WIN1.96 mg
    1.04 mg
  • Magnesiummore is better
    24 mg
    29 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    0 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Beef sirloin, cooked vs Chicken breast, cooked · Foodatron