Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Plate
Beef sirloin, cooked
Beef sirloin, cooked3
VS
Chickpeas, cooked Leader
Chickpeas, cooked7

Chickpeas, cooked leads 7–3 · 10 categories decided

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

Chickpeas, cooked comes out ahead, winning 7 of 10 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Beef sirloin, cooked for more protein, less sugar and more potassium.

Pick Chickpeas, cooked for more fiber, less saturated fat, less sodium, more calcium, more iron, more magnesium and more vitamin C.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    219 kcal
    164 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN29.02 g
    8.86 g
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    27.42 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    7.6 gWIN
  • Total sugarsless is better
    WIN0 g
    4.8 g
  • Total fat
    10.54 g
    2.59 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    4.09 g
    0.27 gWIN
  • Sodiumless is better
    58 mg
    7 mgWIN
  • Potassiummore is better
    WIN355 mg
    291 mg
  • Calciummore is better
    19 mg
    49 mgWIN
  • Ironmore is better
    1.96 mg
    2.89 mgWIN
  • Magnesiummore is better
    24 mg
    48 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    1.3 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Beef sirloin, cooked vs Chickpeas, cooked · Foodatron