Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Plate
Beef sirloin, cooked
Beef sirloin, cooked3
VS
Pork chop, cooked Leader
Pork chop, cooked4

Pork chop, cooked leads 4–3 · 7 categories decided · 3 ties

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

Pork chop, cooked comes out ahead, winning 4 of 7 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Beef sirloin, cooked for more protein, more potassium and more iron.

Pick Pork chop, cooked for less saturated fat, less sodium, more calcium and more magnesium.

Evenly matched on fiber, sugar and vitamin C.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    219 kcal
    209 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN29.02 g
    25.61 g
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    0 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total fat
    10.54 g
    11.06 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    4.09 g
    3.52 gWIN
  • Sodiumless is better
    58 mg
    55 mgWIN
  • Potassiummore is better
    WIN355 mg
    344 mg
  • Calciummore is better
    19 mg
    24 mgWIN
  • Ironmore is better
    WIN1.96 mg
    0.79 mg
  • Magnesiummore is better
    24 mg
    25 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    0 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Beef sirloin, cooked vs Pork chop, cooked · Foodatron