Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Plate
Beef sirloin, cooked
Beef sirloin, cooked1
VS
Tempeh Leader
Tempeh6

Tempeh leads 6–1 · 7 categories decided · 1 tie

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

Tempeh comes out ahead, winning 6 of 7 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Beef sirloin, cooked for more protein.

Pick Tempeh for less saturated fat, less sodium, more potassium, more calcium, more iron and more magnesium.

Evenly matched on vitamin C.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    219 kcal
    192 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN29.02 g
    20.29 g
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    7.64 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    —
  • Total sugarsless is better
    0 g
    —
  • Total fat
    10.54 g
    10.8 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    4.09 g
    2.54 gWIN
  • Sodiumless is better
    58 mg
    9 mgWIN
  • Potassiummore is better
    355 mg
    412 mgWIN
  • Calciummore is better
    19 mg
    111 mgWIN
  • Ironmore is better
    1.96 mg
    2.7 mgWIN
  • Magnesiummore is better
    24 mg
    81 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    0 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Beef sirloin, cooked vs Tempeh · Foodatron