Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Plate
Beef sirloin, cooked
Beef sirloin, cooked2
VS
Yellowfin tuna, cooked Leader
Yellowfin tuna, cooked5

Yellowfin tuna, cooked leads 5–2 · 7 categories decided · 3 ties

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

Yellowfin tuna, cooked comes out ahead, winning 5 of 7 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Beef sirloin, cooked for more calcium and more iron.

Pick Yellowfin tuna, cooked for more protein, less saturated fat, less sodium, more potassium and more magnesium.

Evenly matched on fiber, sugar and vitamin C.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    219 kcal
    130 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    29.02 g
    29.15 gWIN
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    0 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total fat
    10.54 g
    0.59 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    4.09 g
    0.21 gWIN
  • Sodiumless is better
    58 mg
    54 mgWIN
  • Potassiummore is better
    355 mg
    527 mgWIN
  • Calciummore is better
    WIN19 mg
    4 mg
  • Ironmore is better
    WIN1.96 mg
    0.92 mg
  • Magnesiummore is better
    24 mg
    42 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    0 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Beef sirloin, cooked vs Yellowfin tuna, cooked · Foodatron