Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Beef stew, canned Leader
Beef stew, canned7
VS
Blue cheese dressing
Blue cheese dressing1

Beef stew, canned leads 7–1 · 8 categories decided · 2 ties

Beef stew, canned: 100 g · Blue cheese dressing: 100 g.

The verdict

Beef stew, canned comes out ahead, winning 7 of 8 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Beef stew, canned for more protein, more fiber, less sugar, less saturated fat, less sodium, more potassium and more iron.

Pick Blue cheese dressing for more calcium.

Evenly matched on magnesium and vitamin C.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    99 kcal
    484 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN4.41 g
    1.37 g
  • Carbohydrate
    7.85 g
    4.77 g
  • Fibermore is better
    WIN0.9 g
    0.4 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    WIN1.76 g
    3.48 g
  • Total fat
    5.53 g
    51.1 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    WIN2.19 g
    8.28 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN388 mg
    642 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    WIN163 mg
    88 mg
  • Calciummore is better
    12 mg
    37 mgWIN
  • Ironmore is better
    WIN2.48 mg
    0.09 mg
  • Magnesiummore is better
    8 mg
    8 mg
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0.7 mg
    0.7 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Beef stew, canned vs Blue cheese dressing · Foodatron