Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Beef stew, canned
Beef stew, canned3
VS
Clam chowder, New England Leader
Clam chowder, New England6

Clam chowder, New England leads 6–3 · 9 categories decided · 1 tie

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

Clam chowder, New England comes out ahead, winning 6 of 9 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Beef stew, canned for more protein, more fiber and less sodium.

Pick Clam chowder, New England for less sugar, less saturated fat, more potassium, more calcium, more magnesium and more vitamin C.

Evenly matched on iron.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    99 kcal
    72 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN4.41 g
    3.17 g
  • Carbohydrate
    7.85 g
    10.32 g
  • Fibermore is better
    WIN0.9 g
    0.7 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    1.76 g
    0.38 gWIN
  • Total fat
    5.53 g
    2.06 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    2.19 g
    0.96 gWIN
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN388 mg
    516 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    163 mg
    221 mgWIN
  • Calciummore is better
    12 mg
    16 mgWIN
  • Ironmore is better
    2.48 mg
    2.48 mg
  • Magnesiummore is better
    8 mg
    13 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0.7 mg
    4.1 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Beef stew, canned vs Clam chowder, New England · Foodatron