Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Beef stew, canned
Beef stew, canned4
VS
Worcestershire sauce Leader
Worcestershire sauce6

Worcestershire sauce leads 6–4 · 10 categories decided

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

Worcestershire sauce comes out ahead, winning 6 of 10 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Beef stew, canned for more protein, more fiber, less sugar and less sodium.

Pick Worcestershire sauce for less saturated fat, more potassium, more calcium, more iron, more magnesium and more vitamin C.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    99 kcal
    77 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN4.41 g
    0 g
  • Carbohydrate
    7.85 g
    19.17 g
  • Fibermore is better
    WIN0.9 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    WIN1.76 g
    10.03 g
  • Total fat
    5.53 g
    0 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    2.19 g
    0 gWIN
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN388 mg
    1300 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    163 mg
    800 mgWIN
  • Calciummore is better
    12 mg
    107 mgWIN
  • Ironmore is better
    2.48 mg
    5.3 mgWIN
  • Magnesiummore is better
    8 mg
    13 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0.7 mg
    13 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Beef stew, canned vs Worcestershire sauce · Foodatron