Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Black beans, canned Leader
Black beans, canned5
VS
Cranberry beans, canned
Cranberry beans, canned4

Black beans, canned leads 5–4 · 9 categories decided

Both foods compared at 100 kcal.

The verdict

Black beans, canned comes out ahead, winning 5 of 9 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Black beans, canned for less saturated fat, less sodium, more potassium, more iron and more vitamin C.

Pick Cranberry beans, canned for more protein, more fiber, more calcium and more magnesium.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    100 kcal
    100 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    6.63 g
    6.67 gWIN
  • Carbohydrate
    18.19 g
    18.22 g
  • Fibermore is better
    7.58 g
    7.59 gWIN
  • Total sugarsless is better
    0.25 g
    —
  • Total fat
    0.32 g
    0.34 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    WIN0.08 g
    0.09 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN151.65 mg
    400 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    WIN338.46 mg
    313.25 mg
  • Calciummore is better
    38.46 mg
    40.96 mgWIN
  • Ironmore is better
    WIN2.09 mg
    1.87 mg
  • Magnesiummore is better
    38.46 mg
    38.55 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    WIN2.97 mg
    0.96 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Black beans, canned vs Cranberry beans, canned · Foodatron