Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Black beans, canned
Black beans, canned3
VS
Cranberry (roman) beans, cooked Leader
Cranberry (roman) beans, cooked6

Cranberry (roman) beans, cooked leads 6–3 · 9 categories decided

Black beans, canned: 100 g · Cranberry (roman) beans, cooked: 100 g.

The verdict

Cranberry (roman) beans, cooked comes out ahead, winning 6 of 9 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Black beans, canned for less saturated fat, less sodium and more vitamin C.

Pick Cranberry (roman) beans, cooked for more protein, more fiber, more potassium, more calcium, more iron and more magnesium.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    91 kcal
    136 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    6.03 g
    9.34 gWIN
  • Carbohydrate
    16.55 g
    24.46 g
  • Fibermore is better
    6.9 g
    8.6 gWIN
  • Total sugarsless is better
    0.23 g
    —
  • Total fat
    0.29 g
    0.46 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    WIN0.08 g
    0.12 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN138 mg
    237 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    308 mg
    387 mgWIN
  • Calciummore is better
    35 mg
    50 mgWIN
  • Ironmore is better
    1.9 mg
    2.09 mgWIN
  • Magnesiummore is better
    35 mg
    50 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    WIN2.7 mg
    0 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Black beans, canned vs Cranberry (roman) beans, cooked · Foodatron