Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Blue cheese
Blue cheese1
VS
Part-skim ricotta Leader
Part-skim ricotta7

Part-skim ricotta leads 7–1 · 8 categories decided · 2 ties

Both foods compared at 100 kcal.

The verdict

Part-skim ricotta comes out ahead, winning 7 of 8 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Blue cheese for less sugar.

Pick Part-skim ricotta for more protein, less saturated fat, less sodium, more potassium, more calcium, more iron and more magnesium.

Evenly matched on fiber and vitamin C.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    100 kcal
    100 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    6.06 g
    8.25 gWIN
  • Carbohydrate
    0.66 g
    3.72 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    WIN0.14 g
    0.22 g
  • Total fat
    8.14 g
    5.73 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    5.29 g
    3.57 gWIN
  • Sodiumless is better
    324.65 mg
    71.74 mgWIN
  • Potassiummore is better
    72.52 mg
    90.58 mgWIN
  • Calciummore is better
    149.58 mg
    197.1 mgWIN
  • Ironmore is better
    0.09 mg
    0.32 mgWIN
  • Magnesiummore is better
    6.52 mg
    10.87 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    0 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Blue cheese vs Part-skim ricotta · Foodatron