Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Blue crab, canned
Blue crab, canned3
VS
Bluefish, cooked Leader
Bluefish, cooked5

Bluefish, cooked leads 5–3 · 8 categories decided · 1 tie

Blue crab, canned: 100 g · Bluefish, cooked: 100 g.

The verdict

Bluefish, cooked comes out ahead, winning 5 of 8 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Blue crab, canned for less saturated fat, more calcium and more vitamin C.

Pick Bluefish, cooked for more protein, less sodium, more potassium, more iron and more magnesium.

Evenly matched on fiber.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    83 kcal
    159 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    17.88 g
    25.69 gWIN
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    0 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    0 g
    —
  • Total fat
    0.74 g
    5.44 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    WIN0.2 g
    1.17 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    563 mg
    77 mgWIN
  • Potassiummore is better
    259 mg
    477 mgWIN
  • Calciummore is better
    WIN91 mg
    9 mg
  • Ironmore is better
    0.5 mg
    0.62 mgWIN
  • Magnesiummore is better
    36 mg
    42 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    WIN3.3 mg
    0 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Blue crab, canned vs Bluefish, cooked · Foodatron