Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Blue crab, canned Leader
Blue crab, canned5
VS
Canned tuna in oil
Canned tuna in oil3

Blue crab, canned leads 5–3 · 8 categories decided · 2 ties

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

Blue crab, canned comes out ahead, winning 5 of 8 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Blue crab, canned for less saturated fat, more potassium, more calcium, more magnesium and more vitamin C.

Pick Canned tuna in oil for more protein, less sodium and more iron.

Evenly matched on fiber and sugar.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    83 kcal
    198 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    17.88 g
    29.13 gWIN
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    0 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total fat
    0.74 g
    8.21 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    WIN0.2 g
    1.53 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    563 mg
    416 mgWIN
  • Potassiummore is better
    WIN259 mg
    207 mg
  • Calciummore is better
    WIN91 mg
    13 mg
  • Ironmore is better
    0.5 mg
    1.39 mgWIN
  • Magnesiummore is better
    WIN36 mg
    31 mg
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    WIN3.3 mg
    0 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Blue crab, canned vs Canned tuna in oil · Foodatron