Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Blue crab, canned
Blue crab, canned2
VS
Chinook salmon, cooked Leader
Chinook salmon, cooked6

Chinook salmon, cooked leads 6–2 · 8 categories decided · 1 tie

Blue crab, canned: 100 g · Chinook salmon, cooked: 100 g.

The verdict

Chinook salmon, cooked comes out ahead, winning 6 of 8 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Blue crab, canned for less saturated fat and more calcium.

Pick Chinook salmon, cooked for more protein, less sodium, more potassium, more iron, more magnesium and more vitamin C.

Evenly matched on fiber.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    83 kcal
    231 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    17.88 g
    25.72 gWIN
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    0 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    0 g
    —
  • Total fat
    0.74 g
    13.38 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    WIN0.2 g
    3.21 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    563 mg
    60 mgWIN
  • Potassiummore is better
    259 mg
    505 mgWIN
  • Calciummore is better
    WIN91 mg
    28 mg
  • Ironmore is better
    0.5 mg
    0.91 mgWIN
  • Magnesiummore is better
    36 mg
    122 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    3.3 mg
    4.1 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Blue crab, canned vs Chinook salmon, cooked · Foodatron