Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Blue crab, canned
Blue crab, canned4
VS
Clams, cooked
Clams, cooked4

Dead heat · 8 categories decided · 1 tie

Both foods compared at 100 kcal.

The verdict

It's a dead heat — each wins 4 of 8 match-ups.

Pick Blue crab, canned for more protein, less sodium, more calcium and more magnesium.

Pick Clams, cooked for less saturated fat, more potassium, more iron and more vitamin C.

Evenly matched on fiber.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    100 kcal
    100 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN21.54 g
    17.26 g
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    3.47 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    0 g
    —
  • Total fat
    0.89 g
    1.32 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    0.24 g
    0.13 gWIN
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN678.31 mg
    812.16 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    312.05 mg
    424.32 mgWIN
  • Calciummore is better
    WIN109.64 mg
    62.16 mg
  • Ironmore is better
    0.6 mg
    1.9 mgWIN
  • Magnesiummore is better
    WIN43.37 mg
    12.16 mg
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    3.98 mg
    14.93 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Blue crab, canned vs Clams, cooked · Foodatron