Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Blue crab, canned
Blue crab, canned4
VS
Crayfish, cooked
Crayfish, cooked4

Dead heat · 8 categories decided · 2 ties

Blue crab, canned: 100 g · Crayfish, cooked: 100 g.

The verdict

It's a dead heat — each wins 4 of 8 match-ups.

Pick Blue crab, canned for more protein, more calcium, more magnesium and more vitamin C.

Pick Crayfish, cooked for less saturated fat, less sodium, more potassium and more iron.

Evenly matched on fiber and sugar.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    83 kcal
    82 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN17.88 g
    16.77 g
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    0 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total fat
    0.74 g
    1.2 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    0.2 g
    0.18 gWIN
  • Sodiumless is better
    563 mg
    94 mgWIN
  • Potassiummore is better
    259 mg
    296 mgWIN
  • Calciummore is better
    WIN91 mg
    60 mg
  • Ironmore is better
    0.5 mg
    0.83 mgWIN
  • Magnesiummore is better
    WIN36 mg
    33 mg
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    WIN3.3 mg
    0.9 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Blue crab, canned vs Crayfish, cooked · Foodatron