Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Blue crab, canned
Blue crab, canned3
VS
Croaker, cooked Leader
Croaker, cooked6

Croaker, cooked leads 6–3 · 9 categories decided

Blue crab, canned: 100 g · Croaker, cooked: 100 g.

The verdict

Croaker, cooked comes out ahead, winning 6 of 9 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Blue crab, canned for less saturated fat, more calcium and more vitamin C.

Pick Croaker, cooked for more protein, more fiber, less sodium, more potassium, more iron and more magnesium.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    83 kcal
    221 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    17.88 g
    18.2 gWIN
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    7.54 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0.4 gWIN
  • Total sugarsless is better
    0 g
    —
  • Total fat
    0.74 g
    12.67 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    WIN0.2 g
    3.48 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    563 mg
    348 mgWIN
  • Potassiummore is better
    259 mg
    340 mgWIN
  • Calciummore is better
    WIN91 mg
    32 mg
  • Ironmore is better
    0.5 mg
    0.86 mgWIN
  • Magnesiummore is better
    36 mg
    42 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    WIN3.3 mg
    0 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Blue crab, canned vs Croaker, cooked · Foodatron