Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Blue crab, canned
Blue crab, canned2
VS
Cusk, cooked Leader
Cusk, cooked5

Cusk, cooked leads 5–2 · 7 categories decided · 1 tie

Blue crab, canned: 100 g · Cusk, cooked: 100 g.

The verdict

Cusk, cooked comes out ahead, winning 5 of 7 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Blue crab, canned for more calcium and more vitamin C.

Pick Cusk, cooked for more protein, less sodium, more potassium, more iron and more magnesium.

Evenly matched on fiber.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    83 kcal
    112 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    17.88 g
    24.35 gWIN
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    0 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    0 g
    —
  • Total fat
    0.74 g
    0.88 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    0.2 g
    —
  • Sodiumless is better
    563 mg
    40 mgWIN
  • Potassiummore is better
    259 mg
    503 mgWIN
  • Calciummore is better
    WIN91 mg
    13 mg
  • Ironmore is better
    0.5 mg
    1.06 mgWIN
  • Magnesiummore is better
    36 mg
    40 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    WIN3.3 mg
    0 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Blue crab, canned vs Cusk, cooked · Foodatron