Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Blue crab, canned
Blue crab, canned2
VS
Cuttlefish, cooked Leader
Cuttlefish, cooked6

Cuttlefish, cooked leads 6–2 · 8 categories decided · 1 tie

Blue crab, canned: 100 g · Cuttlefish, cooked: 100 g.

The verdict

Cuttlefish, cooked comes out ahead, winning 6 of 8 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Blue crab, canned for less saturated fat and less sodium.

Pick Cuttlefish, cooked for more protein, more potassium, more calcium, more iron, more magnesium and more vitamin C.

Evenly matched on fiber.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    83 kcal
    158 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    17.88 g
    32.48 gWIN
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    1.64 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    0 g
    —
  • Total fat
    0.74 g
    1.4 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    WIN0.2 g
    0.24 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN563 mg
    744 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    259 mg
    637 mgWIN
  • Calciummore is better
    91 mg
    180 mgWIN
  • Ironmore is better
    0.5 mg
    10.84 mgWIN
  • Magnesiummore is better
    36 mg
    60 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    3.3 mg
    8.5 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Blue crab, canned vs Cuttlefish, cooked · Foodatron