Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Blue crab, canned
Blue crab, canned2
VS
King crab, cooked Leader
King crab, cooked6

King crab, cooked leads 6–2 · 8 categories decided · 1 tie

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

King crab, cooked comes out ahead, winning 6 of 8 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Blue crab, canned for less sodium and more calcium.

Pick King crab, cooked for more protein, less saturated fat, more potassium, more iron, more magnesium and more vitamin C.

Evenly matched on fiber.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    83 kcal
    97 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    17.88 g
    19.35 gWIN
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    0 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    0 g
    —
  • Total fat
    0.74 g
    1.54 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    0.2 g
    0.13 gWIN
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN563 mg
    1072 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    259 mg
    262 mgWIN
  • Calciummore is better
    WIN91 mg
    59 mg
  • Ironmore is better
    0.5 mg
    0.76 mgWIN
  • Magnesiummore is better
    36 mg
    63 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    3.3 mg
    7.6 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Blue crab, canned vs King crab, cooked · Foodatron