Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Blue crab, canned Leader
Blue crab, canned5
VS
Lingcod, cooked
Lingcod, cooked3

Blue crab, canned leads 5–3 · 8 categories decided · 1 tie

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

Blue crab, canned comes out ahead, winning 5 of 8 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Blue crab, canned for less saturated fat, more calcium, more iron, more magnesium and more vitamin C.

Pick Lingcod, cooked for more protein, less sodium and more potassium.

Evenly matched on fiber.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    83 kcal
    109 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    17.88 g
    22.64 gWIN
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    0 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    0 g
    —
  • Total fat
    0.74 g
    1.36 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    WIN0.2 g
    0.26 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    563 mg
    76 mgWIN
  • Potassiummore is better
    259 mg
    560 mgWIN
  • Calciummore is better
    WIN91 mg
    18 mg
  • Ironmore is better
    WIN0.5 mg
    0.41 mg
  • Magnesiummore is better
    WIN36 mg
    33 mg
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    WIN3.3 mg
    0 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Blue crab, canned vs Lingcod, cooked · Foodatron