Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Blue crab, canned Leader
Blue crab, canned6
VS
Oysters, cooked
Oysters, cooked3

Blue crab, canned leads 6–3 · 9 categories decided · 1 tie

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

Blue crab, canned comes out ahead, winning 6 of 9 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Blue crab, canned for more protein, less sugar, less saturated fat, more potassium, more magnesium and more vitamin C.

Pick Oysters, cooked for less sodium, more calcium and more iron.

Evenly matched on fiber.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    83 kcal
    102 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN17.88 g
    11.42 g
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    5.45 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    WIN0 g
    1.23 g
  • Total fat
    0.74 g
    3.42 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    WIN0.2 g
    0.95 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    563 mg
    166 mgWIN
  • Potassiummore is better
    WIN259 mg
    139 mg
  • Calciummore is better
    91 mg
    116 mgWIN
  • Ironmore is better
    0.5 mg
    9.21 mgWIN
  • Magnesiummore is better
    WIN36 mg
    35 mg
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    WIN3.3 mg
    0 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Blue crab, canned vs Oysters, cooked · Foodatron