Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Blue crab, canned
Blue crab, canned2
VS
Pollock, cooked Leader
Pollock, cooked6

Pollock, cooked leads 6–2 · 8 categories decided · 1 tie

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

Pollock, cooked comes out ahead, winning 6 of 8 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Blue crab, canned for more calcium and more vitamin C.

Pick Pollock, cooked for more protein, less saturated fat, less sodium, more potassium, more iron and more magnesium.

Evenly matched on fiber.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    83 kcal
    118 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    17.88 g
    24.92 gWIN
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    0 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    0 g
    —
  • Total fat
    0.74 g
    1.26 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    0.2 g
    0.17 gWIN
  • Sodiumless is better
    563 mg
    110 mgWIN
  • Potassiummore is better
    259 mg
    456 mgWIN
  • Calciummore is better
    WIN91 mg
    77 mg
  • Ironmore is better
    0.5 mg
    0.59 mgWIN
  • Magnesiummore is better
    36 mg
    86 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    WIN3.3 mg
    0 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Blue crab, canned vs Pollock, cooked · Foodatron