Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Blue crab, canned
Blue crab, canned4
VS
Salmon, cooked
Salmon, cooked4

Dead heat · 8 categories decided · 2 ties

Blue crab, canned: 100 g · Salmon, cooked: 100 g.

The verdict

It's a dead heat — each wins 4 of 8 match-ups.

Pick Blue crab, canned for less saturated fat, more calcium, more iron and more magnesium.

Pick Salmon, cooked for more protein, less sodium, more potassium and more vitamin C.

Evenly matched on fiber and sugar.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    83 kcal
    206 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    17.88 g
    22.1 gWIN
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    0 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total fat
    0.74 g
    12.35 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    WIN0.2 g
    2.4 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    563 mg
    61 mgWIN
  • Potassiummore is better
    259 mg
    384 mgWIN
  • Calciummore is better
    WIN91 mg
    15 mg
  • Ironmore is better
    WIN0.5 mg
    0.34 mg
  • Magnesiummore is better
    WIN36 mg
    30 mg
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    3.3 mg
    3.7 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Blue crab, canned vs Salmon, cooked · Foodatron