Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Blue crab, canned
Blue crab, canned4
VS
Sheepshead, cooked
Sheepshead, cooked4

Dead heat · 8 categories decided · 1 tie

Blue crab, canned: 100 g · Sheepshead, cooked: 100 g.

The verdict

It's a dead heat — each wins 4 of 8 match-ups.

Pick Blue crab, canned for less saturated fat, more calcium, more magnesium and more vitamin C.

Pick Sheepshead, cooked for more protein, less sodium, more potassium and more iron.

Evenly matched on fiber.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    83 kcal
    126 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    17.88 g
    26.02 gWIN
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    0 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    0 g
    —
  • Total fat
    0.74 g
    1.63 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    WIN0.2 g
    0.36 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    563 mg
    73 mgWIN
  • Potassiummore is better
    259 mg
    512 mgWIN
  • Calciummore is better
    WIN91 mg
    37 mg
  • Ironmore is better
    0.5 mg
    0.67 mgWIN
  • Magnesiummore is better
    WIN36 mg
    35 mg
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    WIN3.3 mg
    0 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Blue crab, canned vs Sheepshead, cooked · Foodatron