Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Blue crab, canned
Blue crab, canned3
VS
Sockeye salmon, cooked Leader
Sockeye salmon, cooked4

Sockeye salmon, cooked leads 4–3 · 7 categories decided · 3 ties

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

Sockeye salmon, cooked comes out ahead, winning 4 of 7 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Blue crab, canned for less saturated fat, more calcium and more vitamin C.

Pick Sockeye salmon, cooked for more protein, less sodium, more potassium and more iron.

Evenly matched on fiber, sugar and magnesium.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    83 kcal
    156 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    17.88 g
    26.48 gWIN
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    0 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total fat
    0.74 g
    5.57 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    WIN0.2 g
    0.97 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    563 mg
    92 mgWIN
  • Potassiummore is better
    259 mg
    436 mgWIN
  • Calciummore is better
    WIN91 mg
    11 mg
  • Ironmore is better
    0.5 mg
    0.52 mgWIN
  • Magnesiummore is better
    36 mg
    36 mg
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    WIN3.3 mg
    0 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Blue crab, canned vs Sockeye salmon, cooked · Foodatron