Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Blue crab, canned
Blue crab, canned3
VS
Turbot, cooked Leader
Turbot, cooked4

Turbot, cooked leads 4–3 · 7 categories decided · 1 tie

Blue crab, canned: 100 g · Turbot, cooked: 100 g.

The verdict

Turbot, cooked comes out ahead, winning 4 of 7 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Blue crab, canned for more calcium, more iron and more vitamin C.

Pick Turbot, cooked for more protein, less sodium, more potassium and more magnesium.

Evenly matched on fiber.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    83 kcal
    122 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    17.88 g
    20.58 gWIN
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    0 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    0 g
    —
  • Total fat
    0.74 g
    3.78 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    0.2 g
    —
  • Sodiumless is better
    563 mg
    192 mgWIN
  • Potassiummore is better
    259 mg
    305 mgWIN
  • Calciummore is better
    WIN91 mg
    23 mg
  • Ironmore is better
    WIN0.5 mg
    0.46 mg
  • Magnesiummore is better
    36 mg
    65 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    WIN3.3 mg
    1.7 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Blue crab, canned vs Turbot, cooked · Foodatron