Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Blue crab, canned
Blue crab, canned2
VS
Walleye, cooked Leader
Walleye, cooked6

Walleye, cooked leads 6–2 · 8 categories decided · 1 tie

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

Walleye, cooked comes out ahead, winning 6 of 8 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Blue crab, canned for less saturated fat and more vitamin C.

Pick Walleye, cooked for more protein, less sodium, more potassium, more calcium, more iron and more magnesium.

Evenly matched on fiber.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    83 kcal
    119 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    17.88 g
    24.54 gWIN
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    0 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    0 g
    —
  • Total fat
    0.74 g
    1.56 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    WIN0.2 g
    0.32 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    563 mg
    65 mgWIN
  • Potassiummore is better
    259 mg
    499 mgWIN
  • Calciummore is better
    91 mg
    141 mgWIN
  • Ironmore is better
    0.5 mg
    1.67 mgWIN
  • Magnesiummore is better
    36 mg
    38 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    WIN3.3 mg
    0 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Blue crab, canned vs Walleye, cooked · Foodatron