Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Blue crab, canned
Blue crab, canned0
VS
Whelk, cooked Leader
Whelk, cooked8

Whelk, cooked leads 8–0 · 8 categories decided · 1 tie

Blue crab, canned: 100 g · Whelk, cooked: 100 g.

The verdict

Whelk, cooked comes out ahead, winning 8 of 8 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Whelk, cooked for more protein, less saturated fat, less sodium, more potassium, more calcium, more iron, more magnesium and more vitamin C.

Evenly matched on fiber.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    83 kcal
    275 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    17.88 g
    47.68 gWIN
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    15.52 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    0 g
    —
  • Total fat
    0.74 g
    0.8 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    0.2 g
    0.06 gWIN
  • Sodiumless is better
    563 mg
    412 mgWIN
  • Potassiummore is better
    259 mg
    694 mgWIN
  • Calciummore is better
    91 mg
    113 mgWIN
  • Ironmore is better
    0.5 mg
    10.06 mgWIN
  • Magnesiummore is better
    36 mg
    172 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    3.3 mg
    6.8 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Blue crab, canned vs Whelk, cooked · Foodatron