Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Blue crab, canned Leader
Blue crab, canned5
VS
Canned white tuna in water
Canned white tuna in water3

Blue crab, canned leads 5–3 · 8 categories decided · 2 ties

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

Blue crab, canned comes out ahead, winning 5 of 8 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Blue crab, canned for less saturated fat, more potassium, more calcium, more magnesium and more vitamin C.

Pick Canned white tuna in water for more protein, less sodium and more iron.

Evenly matched on fiber and sugar.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    83 kcal
    128 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    17.88 g
    23.62 gWIN
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    0 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total fat
    0.74 g
    2.97 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    WIN0.2 g
    0.79 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    563 mg
    377 mgWIN
  • Potassiummore is better
    WIN259 mg
    237 mg
  • Calciummore is better
    WIN91 mg
    14 mg
  • Ironmore is better
    0.5 mg
    0.97 mgWIN
  • Magnesiummore is better
    WIN36 mg
    33 mg
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    WIN3.3 mg
    0 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Blue crab, canned vs Canned white tuna in water · Foodatron