Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Blueberries, canned Leader
Blueberries, canned6
VS
Apples, canned
Apples, canned4

Blueberries, canned leads 6–4 · 10 categories decided

Both foods compared at 100 kcal.

The verdict

Blueberries, canned comes out ahead, winning 6 of 10 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Blueberries, canned for more protein, less saturated fat, less sodium, more iron, more magnesium and more vitamin C.

Pick Apples, canned for more fiber, less sugar, more potassium and more calcium.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    100 kcal
    100 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN0.74 g
    0.27 g
  • Carbohydrate
    25.07 g
    25.13 g
  • Fibermore is better
    1.82 g
    2.99 gWIN
  • Total sugarsless is better
    23.25 g
    22.15 gWIN
  • Total fat
    0.38 g
    0.64 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    WIN0.03 g
    0.1 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN3.41 mg
    4.48 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    45.45 mg
    104.48 mgWIN
  • Calciummore is better
    5.68 mg
    5.97 mgWIN
  • Ironmore is better
    WIN0.38 mg
    0.36 mg
  • Magnesiummore is better
    WIN4.55 mg
    4.48 mg
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    WIN1.25 mg
    0.3 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Blueberries, canned vs Apples, canned · Foodatron