Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Bluefin tuna, cooked Leader
Bluefin tuna, cooked5
VS
Sockeye salmon, canned
Sockeye salmon, canned2

Bluefin tuna, cooked leads 5–2 · 7 categories decided · 2 ties

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

Bluefin tuna, cooked comes out ahead, winning 5 of 7 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Bluefin tuna, cooked for more protein, less sodium, more potassium, more iron and more magnesium.

Pick Sockeye salmon, canned for less saturated fat and more calcium.

Evenly matched on fiber and vitamin C.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    184 kcal
    167 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN29.91 g
    23.59 g
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    0 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    —
    0 g
  • Total fat
    6.28 g
    7.39 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    1.61 g
    1.44 gWIN
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN50 mg
    408 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    WIN323 mg
    314 mg
  • Calciummore is better
    10 mg
    232 mgWIN
  • Ironmore is better
    WIN1.31 mg
    0.65 mg
  • Magnesiummore is better
    WIN64 mg
    31 mg
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    0 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Bluefin tuna, cooked vs Sockeye salmon, canned · Foodatron