Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Bluefin tuna, cooked Leader
Bluefin tuna, cooked4
VS
Canned tuna in oil
Canned tuna in oil3

Bluefin tuna, cooked leads 4–3 · 7 categories decided · 2 ties

Bluefin tuna, cooked: 100 g · Canned tuna in oil: 100 g.

The verdict

Bluefin tuna, cooked comes out ahead, winning 4 of 7 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Bluefin tuna, cooked for more protein, less sodium, more potassium and more magnesium.

Pick Canned tuna in oil for less saturated fat, more calcium and more iron.

Evenly matched on fiber and vitamin C.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    184 kcal
    198 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN29.91 g
    29.13 g
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    0 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    —
    0 g
  • Total fat
    6.28 g
    8.21 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    1.61 g
    1.53 gWIN
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN50 mg
    416 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    WIN323 mg
    207 mg
  • Calciummore is better
    10 mg
    13 mgWIN
  • Ironmore is better
    1.31 mg
    1.39 mgWIN
  • Magnesiummore is better
    WIN64 mg
    31 mg
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    0 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Bluefin tuna, cooked vs Canned tuna in oil · Foodatron