Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Bluefin tuna, cooked Leader
Bluefin tuna, cooked5
VS
Catfish, cooked
Catfish, cooked2

Bluefin tuna, cooked leads 5–2 · 7 categories decided · 2 ties

Bluefin tuna, cooked: 100 g · Catfish, cooked: 100 g.

The verdict

Bluefin tuna, cooked comes out ahead, winning 5 of 7 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Bluefin tuna, cooked for more protein, less sodium, more calcium, more iron and more magnesium.

Pick Catfish, cooked for less saturated fat and more potassium.

Evenly matched on fiber and vitamin C.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    184 kcal
    144 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN29.91 g
    18.44 g
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    0 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    —
    0 g
  • Total fat
    6.28 g
    7.19 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    1.61 g
    1.59 gWIN
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN50 mg
    119 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    323 mg
    366 mgWIN
  • Calciummore is better
    WIN10 mg
    9 mg
  • Ironmore is better
    WIN1.31 mg
    0.28 mg
  • Magnesiummore is better
    WIN64 mg
    23 mg
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    0 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Bluefin tuna, cooked vs Catfish, cooked · Foodatron