Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Bluefin tuna, cooked
Bluefin tuna, cooked4
VS
Chinook salmon, cooked
Chinook salmon, cooked4

Dead heat · 8 categories decided · 1 tie

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

It's a dead heat — each wins 4 of 8 match-ups.

Pick Bluefin tuna, cooked for more protein, less saturated fat, less sodium and more iron.

Pick Chinook salmon, cooked for more potassium, more calcium, more magnesium and more vitamin C.

Evenly matched on fiber.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    184 kcal
    231 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN29.91 g
    25.72 g
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    0 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    —
    —
  • Total fat
    6.28 g
    13.38 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    WIN1.61 g
    3.21 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN50 mg
    60 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    323 mg
    505 mgWIN
  • Calciummore is better
    10 mg
    28 mgWIN
  • Ironmore is better
    WIN1.31 mg
    0.91 mg
  • Magnesiummore is better
    64 mg
    122 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    4.1 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Bluefin tuna, cooked vs Chinook salmon, cooked · Foodatron