Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Bluefin tuna, cooked
Bluefin tuna, cooked4
VS
Coho salmon, cooked
Coho salmon, cooked4

Dead heat · 8 categories decided · 1 tie

Both foods compared at 100 kcal.

The verdict

It's a dead heat — each wins 4 of 8 match-ups.

Pick Bluefin tuna, cooked for more protein, less sodium, more iron and more magnesium.

Pick Coho salmon, cooked for less saturated fat, more potassium, more calcium and more vitamin C.

Evenly matched on fiber.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    100 kcal
    100 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN16.26 g
    14.87 g
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    0 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    —
    —
  • Total fat
    3.41 g
    4.08 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    0.88 g
    0.87 gWIN
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN27.17 mg
    28.8 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    175.54 mg
    247.28 mgWIN
  • Calciummore is better
    5.43 mg
    25 mgWIN
  • Ironmore is better
    WIN0.71 mg
    0.39 mg
  • Magnesiummore is better
    WIN34.78 mg
    19.02 mg
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    0.54 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Bluefin tuna, cooked vs Coho salmon, cooked · Foodatron