Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Bluefin tuna, cooked Leader
Bluefin tuna, cooked5
VS
Croaker, cooked
Croaker, cooked3

Bluefin tuna, cooked leads 5–3 · 8 categories decided · 1 tie

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

Bluefin tuna, cooked comes out ahead, winning 5 of 8 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Bluefin tuna, cooked for more protein, less saturated fat, less sodium, more iron and more magnesium.

Pick Croaker, cooked for more fiber, more potassium and more calcium.

Evenly matched on vitamin C.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    184 kcal
    221 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN29.91 g
    18.2 g
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    7.54 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0.4 gWIN
  • Total sugarsless is better
    —
    —
  • Total fat
    6.28 g
    12.67 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    WIN1.61 g
    3.48 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN50 mg
    348 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    323 mg
    340 mgWIN
  • Calciummore is better
    10 mg
    32 mgWIN
  • Ironmore is better
    WIN1.31 mg
    0.86 mg
  • Magnesiummore is better
    WIN64 mg
    42 mg
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    0 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Bluefin tuna, cooked vs Croaker, cooked · Foodatron