Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Bluefin tuna, cooked
Bluefin tuna, cooked3
VS
Cusk, cooked
Cusk, cooked3

Dead heat · 6 categories decided · 2 ties

Bluefin tuna, cooked: 100 g · Cusk, cooked: 100 g.

The verdict

It's a dead heat — each wins 3 of 6 match-ups.

Pick Bluefin tuna, cooked for more protein, more iron and more magnesium.

Pick Cusk, cooked for less sodium, more potassium and more calcium.

Evenly matched on fiber and vitamin C.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    184 kcal
    112 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN29.91 g
    24.35 g
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    0 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    —
    —
  • Total fat
    6.28 g
    0.88 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    1.61 g
    —
  • Sodiumless is better
    50 mg
    40 mgWIN
  • Potassiummore is better
    323 mg
    503 mgWIN
  • Calciummore is better
    10 mg
    13 mgWIN
  • Ironmore is better
    WIN1.31 mg
    1.06 mg
  • Magnesiummore is better
    WIN64 mg
    40 mg
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    0 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Bluefin tuna, cooked vs Cusk, cooked · Foodatron