Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Bluefin tuna, cooked
Bluefin tuna, cooked2
VS
Cuttlefish, cooked Leader
Cuttlefish, cooked6

Cuttlefish, cooked leads 6–2 · 8 categories decided · 1 tie

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

Cuttlefish, cooked comes out ahead, winning 6 of 8 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Bluefin tuna, cooked for less sodium and more magnesium.

Pick Cuttlefish, cooked for more protein, less saturated fat, more potassium, more calcium, more iron and more vitamin C.

Evenly matched on fiber.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    184 kcal
    158 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    29.91 g
    32.48 gWIN
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    1.64 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    —
    —
  • Total fat
    6.28 g
    1.4 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    1.61 g
    0.24 gWIN
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN50 mg
    744 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    323 mg
    637 mgWIN
  • Calciummore is better
    10 mg
    180 mgWIN
  • Ironmore is better
    1.31 mg
    10.84 mgWIN
  • Magnesiummore is better
    WIN64 mg
    60 mg
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    8.5 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.