Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Bluefin tuna, cooked Leader
Bluefin tuna, cooked5
VS
Flounder/sole, cooked
Flounder/sole, cooked2

Bluefin tuna, cooked leads 5–2 · 7 categories decided · 2 ties

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

Bluefin tuna, cooked comes out ahead, winning 5 of 7 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Bluefin tuna, cooked for more protein, less sodium, more potassium, more iron and more magnesium.

Pick Flounder/sole, cooked for less saturated fat and more calcium.

Evenly matched on fiber and vitamin C.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    184 kcal
    86 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN29.91 g
    15.24 g
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    0 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    —
    0 g
  • Total fat
    6.28 g
    2.37 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    1.61 g
    0.54 gWIN
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN50 mg
    363 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    WIN323 mg
    197 mg
  • Calciummore is better
    10 mg
    25 mgWIN
  • Ironmore is better
    WIN1.31 mg
    0.23 mg
  • Magnesiummore is better
    WIN64 mg
    22 mg
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    0 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Bluefin tuna, cooked vs Flounder/sole, cooked · Foodatron