Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Bluefin tuna, cooked
Bluefin tuna, cooked4
VS
Herring, cooked
Herring, cooked4

Dead heat · 8 categories decided · 1 tie

Bluefin tuna, cooked: 100 g · Herring, cooked: 100 g.

The verdict

It's a dead heat — each wins 4 of 8 match-ups.

Pick Bluefin tuna, cooked for more protein, less saturated fat, less sodium and more magnesium.

Pick Herring, cooked for more potassium, more calcium, more iron and more vitamin C.

Evenly matched on fiber.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    184 kcal
    203 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN29.91 g
    23.03 g
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    0 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    —
    0 g
  • Total fat
    6.28 g
    11.59 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    WIN1.61 g
    2.62 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN50 mg
    115 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    323 mg
    419 mgWIN
  • Calciummore is better
    10 mg
    74 mgWIN
  • Ironmore is better
    1.31 mg
    1.41 mgWIN
  • Magnesiummore is better
    WIN64 mg
    41 mg
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    0.7 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Bluefin tuna, cooked vs Herring, cooked · Foodatron