Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Bluefin tuna, cooked Leader
Bluefin tuna, cooked5
VS
Mackerel, cooked
Mackerel, cooked3

Bluefin tuna, cooked leads 5–3 · 8 categories decided · 1 tie

Both foods compared at 100 kcal.

The verdict

Bluefin tuna, cooked comes out ahead, winning 5 of 8 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Bluefin tuna, cooked for more protein, less saturated fat, less sodium, more potassium and more iron.

Pick Mackerel, cooked for more calcium, more magnesium and more vitamin C.

Evenly matched on fiber.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    100 kcal
    100 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN16.26 g
    9.1 g
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    0 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    —
    —
  • Total fat
    3.41 g
    6.8 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    WIN0.88 g
    1.59 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN27.17 mg
    31.68 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    WIN175.54 mg
    153.05 mg
  • Calciummore is better
    5.43 mg
    5.73 mgWIN
  • Ironmore is better
    WIN0.71 mg
    0.6 mg
  • Magnesiummore is better
    34.78 mg
    37.02 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    0.15 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Bluefin tuna, cooked vs Mackerel, cooked · Foodatron