Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Bluefin tuna, cooked
Bluefin tuna, cooked3
VS
Mahi-mahi, cooked Leader
Mahi-mahi, cooked4

Mahi-mahi, cooked leads 4–3 · 7 categories decided · 2 ties

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

Mahi-mahi, cooked comes out ahead, winning 4 of 7 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Bluefin tuna, cooked for more protein, less sodium and more magnesium.

Pick Mahi-mahi, cooked for less saturated fat, more potassium, more calcium and more iron.

Evenly matched on fiber and vitamin C.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    184 kcal
    109 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN29.91 g
    23.72 g
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    0 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    —
    —
  • Total fat
    6.28 g
    0.9 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    1.61 g
    0.24 gWIN
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN50 mg
    113 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    323 mg
    533 mgWIN
  • Calciummore is better
    10 mg
    19 mgWIN
  • Ironmore is better
    1.31 mg
    1.45 mgWIN
  • Magnesiummore is better
    WIN64 mg
    38 mg
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    0 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Bluefin tuna, cooked vs Mahi-mahi, cooked · Foodatron