Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Bluefin tuna, cooked Leader
Bluefin tuna, cooked6
VS
Pickled herring
Pickled herring1

Bluefin tuna, cooked leads 6–1 · 7 categories decided · 2 ties

Bluefin tuna, cooked: 100 g · Pickled herring: 100 g.

The verdict

Bluefin tuna, cooked comes out ahead, winning 6 of 7 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Bluefin tuna, cooked for more protein, less saturated fat, less sodium, more potassium, more iron and more magnesium.

Pick Pickled herring for more calcium.

Evenly matched on fiber and vitamin C.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    184 kcal
    262 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN29.91 g
    14.19 g
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    9.64 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    —
    7.71 g
  • Total fat
    6.28 g
    18 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    WIN1.61 g
    2.38 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN50 mg
    870 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    WIN323 mg
    69 mg
  • Calciummore is better
    10 mg
    77 mgWIN
  • Ironmore is better
    WIN1.31 mg
    1.22 mg
  • Magnesiummore is better
    WIN64 mg
    8 mg
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    0 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Bluefin tuna, cooked vs Pickled herring · Foodatron