Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Bluefin tuna, cooked
Bluefin tuna, cooked3
VS
Pollock, cooked Leader
Pollock, cooked4

Pollock, cooked leads 4–3 · 7 categories decided · 2 ties

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

Pollock, cooked comes out ahead, winning 4 of 7 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Bluefin tuna, cooked for more protein, less sodium and more iron.

Pick Pollock, cooked for less saturated fat, more potassium, more calcium and more magnesium.

Evenly matched on fiber and vitamin C.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    184 kcal
    118 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN29.91 g
    24.92 g
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    0 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    —
    —
  • Total fat
    6.28 g
    1.26 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    1.61 g
    0.17 gWIN
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN50 mg
    110 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    323 mg
    456 mgWIN
  • Calciummore is better
    10 mg
    77 mgWIN
  • Ironmore is better
    WIN1.31 mg
    0.59 mg
  • Magnesiummore is better
    64 mg
    86 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    0 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Bluefin tuna, cooked vs Pollock, cooked · Foodatron