Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Bluefin tuna, cooked
Bluefin tuna, cooked3
VS
Sablefish, cooked Leader
Sablefish, cooked4

Sablefish, cooked leads 4–3 · 7 categories decided · 2 ties

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

Sablefish, cooked comes out ahead, winning 4 of 7 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Bluefin tuna, cooked for more protein, less saturated fat and less sodium.

Pick Sablefish, cooked for more potassium, more calcium, more iron and more magnesium.

Evenly matched on fiber and vitamin C.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    184 kcal
    250 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN29.91 g
    17.19 g
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    0 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    —
    —
  • Total fat
    6.28 g
    19.62 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    WIN1.61 g
    4.1 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN50 mg
    72 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    323 mg
    459 mgWIN
  • Calciummore is better
    10 mg
    45 mgWIN
  • Ironmore is better
    1.31 mg
    1.64 mgWIN
  • Magnesiummore is better
    64 mg
    71 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    0 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Bluefin tuna, cooked vs Sablefish, cooked · Foodatron